<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Absurd Presumption Of The New Google Algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>It would definitively be a complex algorithm if they will have to base the rankings on such data, and as you said...they would be as accurate as Alexa. On a second point of view, a website that has more pageviews and a lower bounce rate is definitively a sign of quality content, but not all sites are about content...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would definitively be a complex algorithm if they will have to base the rankings on such data, and as you said&#8230;they would be as accurate as Alexa. On a second point of view, a website that has more pageviews and a lower bounce rate is definitively a sign of quality content, but not all sites are about content&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seo man</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator>seo man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see how they could even calculate half the stuff. Using Google toolbar? They will end up being as accurate as Alexa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see how they could even calculate half the stuff. Using Google toolbar? They will end up being as accurate as Alexa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>Indeed it is just crazy. I have websites that have a pretty high Alexa ranking and have more traffic than the lower alexa ranking (i think this is how we met, on alexa talk no? lol).

The fact is that all tracking systems are based on javascript, and not all users have javascript enabled on their site. But still remains the fact that Google can&#039;t get his hands on all the websites on the WWW and this would not bring an accurate results (it would sound like, if you use Google analytics or give access to Google your site is good).

P.S. I got a music related sites with UK traffic, don&#039;t have the time and neither the idea what do with it, drop me an email if you are interested or have ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is just crazy. I have websites that have a pretty high Alexa ranking and have more traffic than the lower alexa ranking (i think this is how we met, on alexa talk no? lol).</p>
<p>The fact is that all tracking systems are based on javascript, and not all users have javascript enabled on their site. But still remains the fact that Google can&#8217;t get his hands on all the websites on the WWW and this would not bring an accurate results (it would sound like, if you use Google analytics or give access to Google your site is good).</p>
<p>P.S. I got a music related sites with UK traffic, don&#8217;t have the time and neither the idea what do with it, drop me an email if you are interested or have ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Making The Money</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>Making The Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/absurd-presumption-google-algorithm/#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>Google are bound to update their algos to take some of this &quot;stuff&quot; into account but to have it as a mjaor influence on rankings is just crazy talk.  The stats we get from even the most accurate stats packages are at best 80% accurate, it would be like basing search ranking on Alexa ranking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google are bound to update their algos to take some of this &#8220;stuff&#8221; into account but to have it as a mjaor influence on rankings is just crazy talk.  The stats we get from even the most accurate stats packages are at best 80% accurate, it would be like basing search ranking on Alexa ranking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

