<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Articles you have missed till 11-02-2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnseo.net/articles-missed-11022007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnseo.net/articles-missed-11022007/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/articles-missed-11022007/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/articles-missed-11022007/#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail Colin. Those are the main reasons why I made these changes, decreasing the load speed (which was not the main reason, but yet a valid one), giving more weight to inner pages and hence ranking better for long tail keywords (even tho inner pages ranked well, but this hopefully will increase the rankings) and increasing the page views.

Doing a change like this it might effect ranking for the homepage (and I say it might, but not necessary is going to happen). My intention to make these changes was long time ago, but I wanted to let the the blog to get little more aged (six months passed since), when I first tried it did effected the rankings for the homepage (but that was when I used the old design).

I will give it 3 weeks (more or less) time to see results of the experiment, after the 3 weeks I will write a review about how the change effected this seo blog in search engine rankings and with user performance.

This would be a drastic change for the readers, but hopefully it won&#039;t  reflect negatively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail Colin. Those are the main reasons why I made these changes, decreasing the load speed (which was not the main reason, but yet a valid one), giving more weight to inner pages and hence ranking better for long tail keywords (even tho inner pages ranked well, but this hopefully will increase the rankings) and increasing the page views.</p>
<p>Doing a change like this it might effect ranking for the homepage (and I say it might, but not necessary is going to happen). My intention to make these changes was long time ago, but I wanted to let the the blog to get little more aged (six months passed since), when I first tried it did effected the rankings for the homepage (but that was when I used the old design).</p>
<p>I will give it 3 weeks (more or less) time to see results of the experiment, after the 3 weeks I will write a review about how the change effected this seo blog in search engine rankings and with user performance.</p>
<p>This would be a drastic change for the readers, but hopefully it won&#8217;t  reflect negatively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin King</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/articles-missed-11022007/comment-page-1/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/articles-missed-11022007/#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to see the results of excepts on the FP once people are use to full articles. I have been running excerpts since day one. No one has said anything one way or another yet. I decided to do it that way because of faster loading and dup content plus it encourages more page views for those that advertise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see the results of excepts on the FP once people are use to full articles. I have been running excerpts since day one. No one has said anything one way or another yet. I decided to do it that way because of faster loading and dup content plus it encourages more page views for those that advertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
