<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evil Competitor MicroSoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnseo.net/evil-competitor-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnseo.net/evil-competitor-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/evil-competitor-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/evil-competitor-microsoft/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>For one or another reason, I was hoping to grab your attention and explain this more in-depth Nelson ;)

All that explains that the evil way to compete a direct concurrence was not actually that evil, but rather lack of quality in the anti-spyware software.

Its always good to have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://helpdeskgeek.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;real geek&lt;/a&gt; reading your blog, isn&#039;t it? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one or another reason, I was hoping to grab your attention and explain this more in-depth Nelson <img src='http://www.dnseo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All that explains that the evil way to compete a direct concurrence was not actually that evil, but rather lack of quality in the anti-spyware software.</p>
<p>Its always good to have a <a href="http://helpdeskgeek.com/" rel="nofollow">real geek</a> reading your blog, isn&#8217;t it? <img src='http://www.dnseo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/evil-competitor-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/evil-competitor-microsoft/#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>In mid-December 2004, Microsoft purchased existing antispyware technology from Giant Software and rebranded it Microsoft AntiSpyware beta 1 to release it to the public in January 6th 2005. This is the version you are showing on your example. 

In 2006, Microsoft released Beta 2 and it changed the name from Anti-spyware Beta 1 to Windows Defender Beta 2, compatible with Windows XP as an optional download, but is fully integrated and part of Windows Vista.

I tested Beta 1 when it came out, and despite the high spyware catch efficiency, it had many issues, including the issue of taking valid genuine system files as threats, this caused many systems to become unstable because people deleted files that are actually needed for the system to operate. I believe this is not intentional from Microsoft, but was some type of definition problems they were having. Is not surprise Firefox shows up here as evil jejejjeje

I agree with you Firefox being better than IE, even though in windows vista Microsoft has taken care of  many vulnerabilities that made IE the bum in the browser arena, one of them being, Internet Explorer up to windows XP was fully integrated in Windows Shell, that means, Internet Explorer had access to anything on windows, which made it really easy to anyone to take control on your system, using another stupid technology that Microsoft introduced named “ActiveX Controls” that has been changed on windows Vista for good. 

If you are using Windows XP or an older Windows Version, I recommend you download Firefox for Better browsing Experience, Is faster, secure, and Easy to use. If you are using Windows Vista, you pick.

Nice post by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In mid-December 2004, Microsoft purchased existing antispyware technology from Giant Software and rebranded it Microsoft AntiSpyware beta 1 to release it to the public in January 6th 2005. This is the version you are showing on your example. </p>
<p>In 2006, Microsoft released Beta 2 and it changed the name from Anti-spyware Beta 1 to Windows Defender Beta 2, compatible with Windows XP as an optional download, but is fully integrated and part of Windows Vista.</p>
<p>I tested Beta 1 when it came out, and despite the high spyware catch efficiency, it had many issues, including the issue of taking valid genuine system files as threats, this caused many systems to become unstable because people deleted files that are actually needed for the system to operate. I believe this is not intentional from Microsoft, but was some type of definition problems they were having. Is not surprise Firefox shows up here as evil jejejjeje</p>
<p>I agree with you Firefox being better than IE, even though in windows vista Microsoft has taken care of  many vulnerabilities that made IE the bum in the browser arena, one of them being, Internet Explorer up to windows XP was fully integrated in Windows Shell, that means, Internet Explorer had access to anything on windows, which made it really easy to anyone to take control on your system, using another stupid technology that Microsoft introduced named “ActiveX Controls” that has been changed on windows Vista for good. </p>
<p>If you are using Windows XP or an older Windows Version, I recommend you download Firefox for Better browsing Experience, Is faster, secure, and Easy to use. If you are using Windows Vista, you pick.</p>
<p>Nice post by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
