<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank Update &#8211; Q1 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Surprise for PageRank Lovers</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1956</link>
		<dc:creator>Surprise for PageRank Lovers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1956</guid>
		<description>[...] page rank update was not expected actually, considering that the Q1 2008 PageRank update was on 12 January but it took lifetime to get updated. Maybe Google is trying to get back to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] page rank update was not expected actually, considering that the Q1 2008 PageRank update was on 12 January but it took lifetime to get updated. Maybe Google is trying to get back to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Hero 3</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Hero 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>I am completely baffled by page rank. My index page with thousands of links pointing to it and a predicted pr5 stayed at 0. Yet some inner pages, with no links pointing to them got pr1. I dont get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am completely baffled by page rank. My index page with thousands of links pointing to it and a predicted pr5 stayed at 0. Yet some inner pages, with no links pointing to them got pr1. I dont get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>Were you involved in text link sellings (TLA or Review sites)? If yes this confirms my believe that the penalized sites remain penalized (by not shifting up) on this quarter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you involved in text link sellings (TLA or Review sites)? If yes this confirms my believe that the penalized sites remain penalized (by not shifting up) on this quarter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code4gold</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Code4gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 00:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see any changes on my main site even though I added hundreds of quality backlinks since the last update. I think google hates me :-( Last update they dropped me from PR4 to PR2 and now there was nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see any changes on my main site even though I added hundreds of quality backlinks since the last update. I think google hates me <img src='http://www.dnseo.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' />  Last update they dropped me from PR4 to PR2 and now there was nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1546</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1546</guid>
		<description>Thats very well said Famous Quotes, it is never smart to have all sources in one basket. But the whole nature of this blog is to prove that you can do seo too.

Now even tho having all sources in one basket is not good, targeted traffic from search engines (mainly, but as well as from relevant sites) converts way much better, hence the search engine traffic does need your attention, especially if you are running a online business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats very well said Famous Quotes, it is never smart to have all sources in one basket. But the whole nature of this blog is to prove that you can do seo too.</p>
<p>Now even tho having all sources in one basket is not good, targeted traffic from search engines (mainly, but as well as from relevant sites) converts way much better, hence the search engine traffic does need your attention, especially if you are running a online business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Famous Quotes</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Famous Quotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>One shouldn&#039;t worry too much about PR because it&#039;s the traffic not the PR that matters. It&#039;s never a good idea to depend only on search engines for traffic as SEs will change their algorithms from time to time to better their service; that&#039;s their job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One shouldn&#8217;t worry too much about PR because it&#8217;s the traffic not the PR that matters. It&#8217;s never a good idea to depend only on search engines for traffic as SEs will change their algorithms from time to time to better their service; that&#8217;s their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>LoL Catherine,
From what I see, those that were previously penalized on PageRank haven&#039;t moved up or down but you can still bribe.

To me it doesn&#039;t bug that much, especially because I got no intentions to monetize this site by text links or similar thingies, what I do care more about is the SERPs (and the site is slowly ranking better and better).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL Catherine,<br />
From what I see, those that were previously penalized on PageRank haven&#8217;t moved up or down but you can still bribe.</p>
<p>To me it doesn&#8217;t bug that much, especially because I got no intentions to monetize this site by text links or similar thingies, what I do care more about is the SERPs (and the site is slowly ranking better and better).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatherineL</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>CatherineL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>This sucks - so we&#039;re all getting hammered.

I&#039;m interested to see what John Chow gets.  If his goes up, I&#039;m going to start bribing people to link to me too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sucks &#8211; so we&#8217;re all getting hammered.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested to see what John Chow gets.  If his goes up, I&#8217;m going to start bribing people to link to me too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linda</title>
		<link>http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnseo.net/pagerank-update-q1-2008/#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>Hm...I dunno...is it possible that it&#039;s still going on? Because my site is showing a zero for the moment, it was two, but the prediction was 4...

I sure hope that it will rise later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm&#8230;I dunno&#8230;is it possible that it&#8217;s still going on? Because my site is showing a zero for the moment, it was two, but the prediction was 4&#8230;</p>
<p>I sure hope that it will rise later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
